Potential React + AI tech stack for 2025

M.F.M Fazrin
8 min readDec 30, 2024

--

The React + AI Powerhouse: Building the Future of Web Apps in 2025

As we look towards 2025, the landscape of web development is being dramatically reshaped by the integration of artificial intelligence. If you’re starting a new React project or considering an upgrade to your existing setup, this article will outline a robust tech stack that blends the power of React with the cutting-edge capabilities of AI.

Foundational Pillars: React and TypeScript

At the heart of our stack is React, the popular JavaScript library for building user interfaces. But in 2025, React alone isn’t enough. We’ll anchor our project with TypeScript, which is almost a non-negotiable part of modern web development.

TypeScript (https://www.typescriptlang.org/):

Pros:

  • Early Error Detection: TypeScript’s static typing catches errors during development, before they hit production, significantly reducing debugging time.
  • Refactoring Confidence: Type safety makes refactoring large codebases far less risky and time-consuming.
  • Improved Autocomplete & Developer Experience: IDEs like VS Code become incredibly powerful with TypeScript, offering robust autocomplete suggestions and in-editor documentation.
  • Team Onboarding: Explicit typing provides self-documenting code, making it easier for new team members to understand and contribute effectively.
  • AI Code Assistant Compatibility: Modern AI coding tools like GitHub Copilot work significantly better with typed code, offering smarter code suggestions and refactoring assistance.

Cons:

  • Learning Curve: TypeScript has a learning curve, especially for developers used to purely dynamic JavaScript.
  • Initial Setup Overhead: Adding type definitions and configuring TypeScript requires an initial setup effort.
  • Boilerplate: May add a small amount of boilerplate code compared to pure JavaScript.

Meta Frameworks: Streamlining React Development

To elevate the React experience, we will employ a meta-framework that provides structure and essential features.

Next.js:

Pros:

  • Full React 19 Support: Provides seamless support for the latest React features.
  • Integrated Routing: Built-in routing capabilities, removing the complexity of managing client-side navigation.
  • API Management: Simplifies creating and handling server-side APIs for your application.
  • Performance Optimization: Offers built-in optimizations for performance, like image optimization and code splitting.
  • Server-Side Rendering (SSR): Improves initial page load performance and SEO.

Cons:

  • Opinionated: Next.js can be somewhat opinionated, which might limit certain customization options.
  • Learning Curve: Though streamlined, Next.js does have a learning curve.

Remix & TanStack :

  • Remix focuses on web standards and has innovative form handling and data loading patterns.
  • TanStack is a newer framework built by the creators of TanStack Query and aims to bring a “batteries included” approach.

Pros

  • Both frameworks are pushing for innovation and a simplified development experience.
  • Remix has excellent built-in features for data fetching and mutations.
  • TanStack has potential for seamless integration with other TanStack libraries.

Cons

  • Both are relatively new so will likely have fewer community resources compared to Next.js
  • Remix’s learning curve might be steep compared to other frameworks.
  • TanStack is still evolving and subject to future change.

Styling: Speed and AI-Assisted Design

Styling remains a crucial aspect of UI development. In 2025, utility-first CSS frameworks enhanced by AI are the go-to choice.

Tailwind CSS:

Pros:

  • Rapid Prototyping: Tailwind’s utility classes enable rapid prototyping and iterative design.
  • AI Compatibility: AI tools can intelligently generate precise Tailwind classes, accelerating the styling process.
  • Customization: Offers easy ways to customize themes and component styling using configuration files.
  • Consistency: Enforces design consistency across projects by providing a set vocabulary of styles.

Cons:

  • Initial Learning Curve: May feel overwhelming for developers used to traditional CSS.
  • Class Name Clutter: Can sometimes lead to lengthy class lists in HTML.

Shadcn UI :

Pros:

  • Beautiful Components: Provides a library of visually appealing, pre-built UI components designed for Tailwind CSS.
  • Customizable: Highly customizable to match your project’s branding.
  • Easy Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing Tailwind CSS setups.

Cons:

  • Reliance on Tailwind: Requires proficiency in Tailwind CSS.
  • Limited Customization Compared to DIY: May not have the same level of low-level customization options as building from scratch.

State Management: Client and Server Harmony

Managing state efficiently is critical for any React application.

Zustand:

Pros:

  • Zero Boilerplate: Minimal setup and extremely easy to use, eliminating the need for excessive boilerplate code.
  • Tiny Bundle Size: Keeps your bundle size small, improving performance,
  • Simple API: Has a straightforward and intuitive API.
  • Performance: It’s designed with performance in mind.

Cons:

  • Less Feature-Rich: Does not include features like time-travel debugging or built-in persistence, which you might find in Redux.
  • Potential Lack of Ecosystem: Smaller ecosystems compared to Redux or MobX might lead to fewer available tools and resources.

TanStack Query :

Pros:

  • Data Fetching Made Easy: Simplifies handling data fetching, caching, and synchronization.
  • Optimized Server State: Designed specifically for server state management, making common tasks straightforward.
  • Built-in Caching: Manages caching out of the box, improving application responsiveness.
  • Data Synchronization: Automatically synchronizes data across the application.

Cons:

  • Learning Curve: May require time to learn its concepts, such as caching and data invalidation.
  • More Complexity: Can be overkill for smaller projects with simple data-fetching needs.

Animations: Engaging User Experiences

Adding animations to your interface can significantly improve the user experience.

Framer Motion :

Pros:

  • Declarative Animations: Enables declarative animations, making it easier to understand and manage.
  • Wide Range of Animations: Suitable for both simple transitions and complex motion designs.
  • React Integration: Integrates seamlessly with React, making it easy to add animations to your components.

Cons:

  • Learning Curve: Learning its API and animation concepts may require some effort.
  • Potential Performance Issues: Complex animations, if not optimized, can affect performance.

Testing: Ensuring Quality and Reliability

Thorough testing is vital for application stability.

Vitest:

Pros:

  • Fast Performance: Known for its extremely fast performance, leading to a quicker feedback loop.
  • Easy Setup: Designed to be easy to set up and configure.
  • Built-in Watch Mode: Provides a live watch mode that reruns tests on code changes.
  • Jest Compatibility: Good compatibility with Jest, making it easy for projects to migrate.

React Testing Library:

Pros:

  • User-Centric Approach: Encourages writing tests that mimic user behavior.
  • Reduced Refactor Overhead: Tests are less brittle, reducing the need to update them when components are refactored.

Cons:

  • Requires Adjustment: Developers may need to adapt to its “user-centric” way of testing.
  • Limited Testing Scope: Might not be suitable for cases where deeper component implementation testing is needed.

Playwright:

Pros:

  • Cross-Browser Testing: Supports testing across all major browsers.
  • Reliable Automation: Provides a stable environment for UI automation testing.
  • Rich API: Offers a feature-rich API for interacting with web pages.
  • Auto-Waiting: Automatically waits for elements to be actionable, reducing flakiness.

Cons:

  • Steeper Learning Curve: Requires a steeper learning curve compared to unit testing frameworks.
  • Resource Intensive: End-to-end tests can be more resource-intensive and slower than unit tests.

Data Handling: Tables and Forms

Efficient data manipulation is vital for many applications.

TanStack Table :

Pros:

  • Type-Safe Tables: Provides type-safe implementations for tables, improving code reliability.
  • Virtual Scrolling: Offers virtual scrolling for large data sets, ensuring smooth performance.
  • Advanced Features: Supports sorting, filtering, and column setups.

Cons:

  • Complexity: Can be complex to learn and implement at first.
  • Limited Documentation: May lack documentation for more complex use cases.

React Hook Form:

Pros:

  • Speed: Designed for high-performance form handling.
  • Easy Validation: Simplifies validation, especially when integrated with Zod.
  • TypeScript Support: Works seamlessly with TypeScript.
  • Small Bundle Size: Lightweight with a small bundle size.
  • Intuitive API: Has an intuitive API.

Cons:

  • Limited Features: Some features might be less advanced compared to larger form libraries like Formik.
  • Validation Reliance: Primarily relies on Zod for validation schema creation and management.

Backend and Database: AI-Powered Foundations

For our backend, we need robust solutions that integrate with AI.

Supabase:

Pros:

  • Full-Blown Backend: Provides a comprehensive backend with database, authentication, and storage.
  • AI Features: Offers vector similarity search, embedding storage, and AI-powered SQL generation.
  • Real-Time Subscriptions: Supports real-time updates via web sockets.

Cons:

  • Vendor Lock-in: May create vendor lock-in, as it relies heavily on the Supabase platform.
  • Learning Curve: Requires learning the Supabase-specific API and services.

Cross-Platform Mobile Development: React Native

For reaching mobile platforms without needing to create entirely separate applications, we can utilize React Native.

React Native with Expo:

  • Pros:
  • Write Once, Run Everywhere: Enables code sharing across iOS and Android.
  • Native Performance: Provides native performance when needed.
  • Hot Reloading: Offers hot reloading for rapid development cycles.
  • Large Ecosystem: Benefits from a large ecosystem of libraries and tools.
  • Expo: Eases common development tasks with Expo tools, such as easier builds and updates.

Cons:

  • Performance Limitations: Performance can lag behind truly native development in very complex situations.
  • Platform Specific Issues: Might encounter platform-specific issues that require extra attention.

Component Development: Isolation and Collaboration

Component development is made easier using Storybook.

Storybook :

Pros:

  • Component Isolation: Enables building and testing components in isolation.
  • Testing Environment: Provides a built-in environment for testing components.
  • Documentation Generation: Automatically generates documentation for your components.
  • Visual Regression Testing: Supports visual regression testing to catch UI issues.
  • Collaboration Features: Provides collaborative features for designers and developers.

Cons:

  • Setup: Initial setup can require additional configuration
  • Overhead: Adds overhead to the project when only very simple components are needed.

Authentication: Secure and Straightforward

User authentication can often be a complex process, making a well-designed solution like Clerk ideal.

Clerk:

Pros:

  • Easy Implementation: Straightforward integration and setup.
  • React Support: Supports React, Next.js, React Native, and more.
  • Generous Free Plan: Offers a free plan with useful features for startups and early-stage projects.

Cons:

  • Vendor Lock-in: Tightly coupled to the Clerk ecosystem, so switching to a different authentication service could be complex.
  • Cost: May become costly as your usage scales.

Hosting: Seamless Deployments

Vercel is a cloud platform that enables developers to deploy and scale web applications seamlessly. It is known for its simplicity, performance optimization, and integration with modern frameworks like Next.js. Vercel provides serverless deployment, automated scaling, and a global content delivery network (CDN) to ensure fast and efficient delivery of web content. It’s widely used for hosting static sites, dynamic applications, and front-end projects, making it a go-to choice for developers focusing on user-centric web experiences.

Vercel:

Pros:

  • Easy Deployment: Makes deployment straightforward and fast.
  • Integration with Next.js: Provides seamless integration with Next.js.
  • Scalability: Handles scaling your application with minimal effort.

Cons:

  • Cost: Can become expensive for high-traffic applications.
  • Limited Control: Less control over the server infrastructure compared to other hosting solutions.

AI-Powered Tools: Code Editors and Design Assistants

To improve our development efficiency, we will leverage AI tools.

Cursor:

Pros:

  • AI-First Code Editor: Built from the ground up with AI at its core.
  • Powerful AI Features: Offers advanced AI coding assistance, code generation, and refactoring.

Cons:

  • Cost: AI features and advanced tooling will require a paid subscription.

Bolt :

Bolt is an AI-powered web development agent that allows you to prompt, run, edit, and deploy full-stack applications directly from your browser — no local setup required. If you’re here to build your own AI-powered web dev agent using the Bolt open-source codebase

Pros:

  • Prompt to Application: Generates working React apps from plain language prompts.
  • Full-Stack Generation: Creates complete applications, including frontend and backend elements.
  • Speed: Can quickly generate prototypes and functional applications.
  • Cost: High cost due to the significant AI processing that goes into code generation.
  • Control: Output may be different than what you are anticipating, requiring more customization.

This article has outlined a potent React + AI tech stack for 2025, combining the power of React, TypeScript, and various specialized libraries, all while being enhanced by cutting-edge AI tools. This stack allows you to build feature-rich, scalable applications quickly and reliably. While the AI tools come at a price, they represent a leap forward in productivity and developer experience, making them invaluable for future projects. As the tech landscape continues to evolve, embrace these technologies and start building the future of web applications today.

--

--

M.F.M Fazrin
M.F.M Fazrin

Written by M.F.M Fazrin

Senior Software Development Specialist @ Primary Health Care Corporation (Qatar)

No responses yet